Freight House Operations: LCL from Foreign Road Freight Houses
On AIR 1 while WM , N&W, CRR, and VGN trains had trackage rights over some or all of the layout, there were no freight houses for these foreign roads. Often in towns served by two or more competing lines one will find a freight house for each of these roads. In Winchester, VA the freight houses for the PRR and the B&O still stand today.
On AIR 2 I do not plan model the extensive trackage rights as on the first layout. I plan to have these foreign roads to come on to the layout via either a short run of their track, visibly modeled, terminating at an interchange point, or simply a transfer from an off layout staging yard. In short fairly limited presence.
However at each of these interchange points there should be some foreign road structures in their colors to give strong visual clues that these tracks do indeed belong to someone else. In a few cases, WM and N&W for sure, some of these foreign road structures will be a freight house.
Again, relying on the Kalmbach book ob LCL by Jeff Wilson, we learn that even relatively small towns receive a large number of LCL freight cars. He states, for example, that a community of 5000 could expect to receive at least five LCL boxcars per day.
Additionally these freight houses are an exchange point between one road and another, so a boxcar or two would travel between the AIR freight house and the WM or N&W freight house (FH) each day. To extrapolate further, the AIR outbound house might have one car for the WM FH , as well as another car from the AIR Transfer FH to the WM FH. Add to this a car from the N&W FH to the AIR Inbound FH & Transfer FH as well as to the WM FH, and so on…
It adds up to a LOT of cars moving across the layout. I’ll need a string diagram!
Now on AIR2 LCL is not the primary game of the layout. It’s a big part, but not the primary part. On layouts where LCL is the Primary game, each boxcar of LCL might have multiple waybills in its card pocket.
At each freight house these bills might need to be removed and resorted before forwarding the car
For example at the WM FH a car arrives, heading to the AIR with the following bills in its card pocket:
AIR, AIR, N&W, WEST, WEST
The bills are removed and the car is reloaded as follows:
AIR, AIR, WEST, WEST
The remaining N&W bill waits at the WM FH until there is a LCL car ready for shipment to the N&W.
The N&W bound car arrives at the WM FH with the following bills:
N&W, N&W, AIR, AIR, WEST
That car is unloaded and then reloaded for shipment to the N&W FH as follows:
N&W, N&W, N&W
The remaining bills for forwarding to points WEST and the AIR are held at the WM FH until another AIR car is loaded, and so on…
The more connections that are made at one freight house, the more complicated this process becomes. At this point try to imagine this process being replicated at the AIR’s 48 spot transfer house!
At this point in my design and planning stage I think that simply the movement of the cars is enough, however I am continually seduced by the LCL bill reconciliation process. Stay tuned.
I used, and to some extent, will use multiple waybills to represent LCL packages. Do you? Do you even simulate railroad LCL business at all?
If you do would you consider trying to use multiple bills to simulate LCL packages?
If you do model complex LCL operations, how do you do it?
I’m really interested!
Comments
Post a Comment