Distant Blocking
On AIR 1 I asked YM’s to just block for the next yard down the line. It was not really THAT sophisticated. Waybills routing cars off layout had four destinations:
WEST
EAST
SOUTH
WM
That was it.
On AIR 2 I am asking YM’s to block cars to far more “sub-destinations”
For example WEST is now broken down to two major sub-categories : St. Louis or Chicago
And each of them is broken down further. For example the CHICAGO block is broken into:
Cleveland
Toledo
Detroit
Chicago
The ST. LOUIS block is similarly broken down.
Here’s my conundrum, at a recent clinic Mark Amfahr presented a great deal of prototypical data that suggests that Steam Era railroads simply blocked cars for the next yard, and the concept of “Distant Blocking” is a product of the 1960’s-1970’s.
Admittedly Mark worked for large Western Roads (UP for example) and this information might not be completely true for Eastern roads where the physical plants were vastly different.
What I wanted to do on AIR2 was to give my YM position the ability to increase or decrease the complexity of the position to suit the ability of the operator.
If a newbie was YM, he could accomplish his task if all the CHICAGO (Denoted by the color Orange as well as the written destination) cars were in the right staging yard. I would not be faced with a Re-staging nightmare if the Cleveland cars were mixed with the Detroit cars.
On the other hand a veteran YM could build four blocks for CHICAGO bound trains: Cleveland, Toledo, Detroit, Chicago.
-BUT-
Now we add the “Amfahr Curve Ball”. On AIR2 the Atlantic Inland reaches Chicago by connecting with the WLE railroad at Zanesville, Oh.*
So should I ask my YM’s to block all cars going to Chicago, Detroit, Toledo, and Cleveland into a block for the WLE in Zanesville, and call it good?
*As part of the Alphabet Route the Atlantic Inland hands off to the Wheeling and Lake Erie (WLE), who then hands off to the Nickel Plate (NKP) who takes the train into Chicago.
Comments
Post a Comment